Korean / Actions and places

Korean existence and possession

Beginner

있어요 says that someone or something exists, is present, or is available. In context it also expresses having something. 없어요 is the ordinary counterpart for absence or not having. Mark the thing that exists or is lacking with or in the explicit beginner pattern. Add a location with or a person as a topic when you need to make the situation clear.

Try the challenge Read the explanation ↓English explanations · Korean examples

Introduce what is present

Use 있어요 to introduce the presence of something in a scene. 방에 창문이 있어요 tells the listener that a window is present in the room. The room establishes the location, the window is what exists there, and 있어요 completes the statement. English often begins this kind of sentence with there is or there are, but Korean does not need a separate dummy word meaning there at the front.

The same ordinary predicate can be used for people, animals, things, and events. 고양이가 있어요 can introduce the presence of a cat. 책이 있어요 can introduce a book. You do not choose a different basic existence verb merely because the noun is alive. Register and honorific choices can still matter when talking about respected people, which is a separate issue from a simple animate versus inanimate distinction.

An existence sentence does not automatically identify an owner. A book may be on a shared desk, in a store, or in a library. Saying 책이 있어요 tells you that a book is present in the relevant situation; it does not by itself say that the speaker legally owns it. Add the context needed for your message. If you are describing a room, mention the room. If you are answering whether you have a book available, the possession interpretation may already be clear.

방에 창문이 있어요.

Bange changmuni isseoyo.

There is a window in the room.

고양이가 있어요.

Goyangiga isseoyo.

There is a cat.

References for this explanation

Mark the existing thing with i or ga

In the explicit pattern, the thing that exists takes after a consonant and after a vowel. ends in a consonant, giving 책이 있어요. 의자 ends in a vowel, giving 의자가 있어요. The choice depends on the final sound of the noun, not on whether the English translation uses there is or I have. The Korean thing possessed is still the subject of the existence predicate in this construction.

This differs from an action sentence with an object. 책을 읽어요 marks a book as what someone reads. 책이 있어요 marks a book as what is present. The noun stays the same while its role changes. Translating have as an ordinary transitive English verb can tempt you to write 책을 있어요, but that does not fit the basic Korean pattern. Work from the Korean relationship rather than from English object order.

Particles attach directly to the preceding noun. Write 가방이 and 시계가 without an internal space, then leave a space before 있어요. In pronunciation, a final consonant can link to the vowel beginning particle, as in 책이. The spelling still shows plus 이. Practice choosing the form while also saying the complete phrase naturally. If you make a mistake, identify whether you chose the wrong role or merely the wrong vowel versus consonant form.

책이 있어요.

Chaegi isseoyo.

There is a book, or I have a book in context.

의자가 있어요.

Uijaga isseoyo.

There is a chair.

가방이 있어요.

Gabangi isseoyo.

There is a bag, or I have a bag in context.

Describe an available bag

Say that you have a bag using the explicit subject pattern.

  1. The intended relationship is having something available.
  2. 가방 ends in a consonant, so the thing takes 이.
  3. Finish with 있어요, leaving the possessor understood from context.

가방이 있어요.

References for this explanation

Describe having things and abstract resources

A person can be introduced as the topic of a possession statement. 저는 차가 있어요 says that the speaker has a car in the relevant context. 저는 supplies the person being discussed, 차가 names the thing, and 있어요 expresses its availability or possession relationship in that setting. The literal grammatical shape differs from English I have a car, but the natural translation need not copy that shape word for word.

The same pattern works with things that are not physical objects. 시간이 있어요 means having time available, while 돈이 있어요 means having money. A class or appointment can also be described as present in a schedule: 오늘 수업이 있어요 says that there is class today or that the speaker has class today, depending on context. These uses extend the existence pattern beyond objects that you can point to in a room.

Do not force an ownership interpretation onto every noun. Having time, having a scheduled class, and having a bag at hand are different real world relationships, even though Korean can describe them with 있어요. A beginner translation should fit the actual situation. When context could support several readings, add a time, a location, or a topic to clarify it. This is more reliable than assuming that the predicate alone names one specific kind of possession in every sentence.

저는 차가 있어요.

Jeoneun chaga isseoyo.

I have a car.

시간이 있어요.

Sigani isseoyo.

I have time.

오늘 수업이 있어요.

Oneul sueobi isseoyo.

I have class today.

References for this explanation

Use eopseoyo to describe what is missing

없어요 is the ordinary negative counterpart of 있어요. 방에 냉장고가 없어요 says that there is no refrigerator in the room. 시간이 없어요 says that the relevant person has no time available. Keep the same basic noun phrase roles when you switch from presence to absence. The missing thing still takes or in the explicit pattern, and the location still takes when you include it.

Absence is different from negative identity. 물이 없어요 means there is no water or that water is not available. 물이 아니에요 means the thing being identified is not water. A bottle could contain juice rather than water, or it could be empty. Those are different situations and need different statements. Select the relationship before choosing the negative predicate.

A negative existence sentence also does not always mean that something never exists anywhere. 도서관에 없어요 can mean that a specific book is not at that library now, although it exists somewhere else. 오늘 시간이 없어요 limits the lack of available time to the current day's context. Location and time phrases constrain the claim. For a helpful answer, add a positive alternative if you know one, such as saying where the object actually is or when you do have time.

방에 냉장고가 없어요.

Bange naengjanggoga eopseoyo.

There is no refrigerator in the room.

오늘 시간이 없어요.

Oneul sigani eopseoyo.

I do not have time today.

물이 없어요.

Muri eopseoyo.

There is no water.

References for this explanation

Distinguish having a thing from identifying whose it is

A possession statement with 있어요 differs from identifying an item as someone's property. 저는 책이 있어요 says I have a book. 제 책이에요 says it is my book. The second sentence contains a noun phrase meaning my book and the noun identity ending 이에요. It does not use the existence predicate. You may need either sentence in a real conversation, but they answer different questions.

is a humble form of my, related to 저, while is a familiar form related to 나. With another person's name or noun, can express a possessive relationship, as in 친구의 가방. In conversation, this possessive particle is often omitted when the relationship is clear. The relationship belongs inside the noun phrase. The phrase can then take a subject particle in 친구의 가방이 있어요 or appear in an identity sentence when you identify the bag.

Pay attention to the speaker's point of view when answering. If someone asks whether you have a bag, 가방이 있어요 can answer the availability question. If someone points to a bag and asks whose it is, 제 가방이에요 identifies it as yours. Neither answer needs to include every fact about the object. A well formed sentence becomes a useful answer when it supplies the kind of information the other person requested.

제 책이에요.

Je chaegieyo.

It is my book.

제 가방이 있어요.

Je gabangi isseoyo.

My bag is here or present in the relevant setting.

친구의 가방이에요.

Chinguui gabangieyo.

It is a friend’s bag.

Answer the correct question

Someone points to your bag and asks whose bag it is.

  1. The question asks for ownership identification, not whether a bag exists.
  2. Choose 제 가방, my bag.
  3. Attach 이에요 because 가방 ends in a consonant.
Compare your reasoning

제 가방이에요.

References for this explanation

Ask whether something exists or where it is

A yes or no question can use the same polite form with suitable intonation: 가방이 있어요? asks whether a bag is present or available. In a conversation about what the other person has, it can mean Do you have a bag? An answer such as 네, 있어요 or 아니요, 없어요 supplies the relevant presence or absence without repeating the noun. The context keeps the missing information recoverable.

A where question assumes or investigates a location: 책이 어디에 있어요? asks where the book is. This differs from 방에 책이 있어요?, which asks whether a book is in the room. For a location answer, a short phrase such as 책상 위에 있어요 is sufficient when the book is already understood. The position noun follows 책상, and marks the complete location phrase.

Topic and contrast markers can adjust how information is presented. 책은 있어요 can emphasize that a book is available, perhaps while some other item is missing. The statement is not automatically wrong because it has instead of 이. The role of subject marking and the discourse role of topic marking need to be considered together. In the exercises here, prompts specify when the explicit subject pattern is required, so you can practice the form without treating every other natural conversational choice as an error.

가방이 있어요?

Gabangi isseoyo?

Do you have a bag?

책이 어디에 있어요?

Chaegi eodie isseoyo?

Where is the book?

책상 위에 있어요.

Chaeksang wie isseoyo.

It is on the desk.

책은 있어요.

Chaegeun isseoyo.

As for a book, there is one available.

References for this explanation

Check time, quantity, and respectful reference

The past forms 있었어요 and 없었어요 describe an earlier presence or absence. 어제 시간이 있었어요 says that you had time yesterday. 어제 시간이 없었어요 says that you did not. The thing involved remains marked in the same way; the final predicate supplies the earlier time perspective. If today's situation differs, make that difference explicit rather than assuming that the listener can infer the whole timeline from the past form alone.

Korean nouns do not always require a singular versus plural choice matching English articles and endings. 책이 있어요 can concern one book or books, depending on the context. Do not assume that the lack of a plural suffix proves that exactly one object exists. When exact quantity matters, add an appropriate number and counter, which the number lessons develop. A translation using a book in a simple exercise is one contextual reading, not a universal numerical meaning of 책.

Polite speech to the listener and respectful reference to another person are related but distinct. The ending makes these examples polite, while talking about a respected person's presence may require 계세요, from 계시다. Learn that as an additional honorific construction rather than applying a rule that all living things need it. For this lesson's ordinary objects and your own availability, 있어요 and 없어요 provide the core pattern. Before answering, check the relationship, the participant, and the context that makes the intended reading clear.

어제 시간이 있었어요.

Eoje sigani isseosseoyo.

I had time yesterday.

어제 시간이 없었어요.

Eoje sigani eopseosseoyo.

I did not have time yesterday.

References for this explanation

Notice the difference

Common mistakes

Do not use an object particle for the thing possessed

Instead of저는 책을 있어요.

For this meaning저는 책이 있어요.

In this construction the book takes the subject particle, even though English has it as the object of have.

Distinguish absence from identity

Instead of시간이 아니에요.

For this meaning시간이 없어요.

For not having time, choose 없어요.

Use the possessive form for my

Instead of저 책이에요.

For this meaning제 책이에요.

제 책 is my book. 저 책 can refer to that book over there.

Keep the past absence predicate

Instead of어제 시간이 없어요.

For this meaning어제 시간이 없었어요.

The ordinary earlier situation requested here uses the past form 없었어요.

From understanding to using

Make your own example.

Try these without answer choices. Say your answer aloud or write it below, then compare your reasoning with the model.

Your turn 1

Describe a room in two sentences: it has a window and has no refrigerator.

Compare with a model

방에 창문이 있어요. 냉장고가 없어요. (Bange changmuni isseoyo. Naengjanggoga eopseoyo.)

There is a window in the room. There is no refrigerator.

The location established in the first sentence can remain understood. Each thing takes the subject particle selected by its final sound.

  • Use after 창문.
  • Use after 냉장고.
  • Switch to 없어요 for the missing item.

Your turn 2

Say that you had no time yesterday but have time today, using two separate polite sentences.

Compare with a model

어제 시간이 없었어요. 오늘 시간이 있어요. (Eoje sigani eopseosseoyo. Oneul sigani isseoyo.)

I did not have time yesterday. I have time today.

The time words and final predicates distinguish past absence from current availability.

  • Use 없었어요 for yesterday.
  • Use 있어요 for today.
  • Keep 시간이 in both sentences.

Put it into practice

Make the next choice.

14 questions · No timer

Choose a response and learn why it works. Your score reflects your first answer to each question. You can revisit anything you miss.

Choose an answer, then open the explanation to check your reasoning.

Question 1

Introduce a chair as present, using the explicit subject particle.

  • 의자가 있어요.
  • 의자를 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 의자가 있어요.

의자가 있어요.: 의자 ends in a vowel, so marks the existing thing.

의자를 있어요.: The ordinary existence pattern does not mark the chair as an object.

Question 2

Use the explicit subject pattern for a book being present.

  • 책가 있어요.
  • 책이 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 책이 있어요.

책가 있어요.: is the wrong subject particle form after the final consonant.

책이 있어요.: ends in a consonant and takes 이.

Question 3

You have a car. Choose the ordinary possession construction.

  • 저는 차가 있어요.
  • 저는 차를 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 저는 차가 있어요.

저는 차가 있어요.: The person is the topic and the car is the existing or possessed thing.

저는 차를 있어요.: This incorrectly treats the car as an object of 있어요.

Question 4

You have time available today. Which sentence fits?

  • 오늘 시간이 아니에요.
  • 오늘 시간이 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 오늘 시간이 있어요.

오늘 시간이 아니에요.: This denies an identity rather than expressing availability.

오늘 시간이 있어요.: The time is available in today’s context.

Question 5

The room has no refrigerator. Which sentence fits?

  • 방에 냉장고가 없어요.
  • 방에 냉장고가 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 방에 냉장고가 없어요.

방에 냉장고가 없어요.: The refrigerator is absent from the specified room.

방에 냉장고가 있어요.: This states the opposite, that a refrigerator is present.

Question 6

A bottle is empty and no water is available. Choose the absence statement.

  • 물이 아니에요.
  • 물이 없어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 물이 없어요.

물이 아니에요.: This says something is not water, which is a different claim.

물이 없어요.: 없어요 expresses the absence of water.

Question 7

Someone points to your book and asks whose it is. Which answer identifies ownership?

  • 제 책이에요.
  • 책이 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 제 책이에요.

제 책이에요.: The noun identity construction identifies it as your book.

책이 있어요.: This says a book is present or available, without identifying whose it is.

Question 8

Choose the humble first person possessive phrase my bag.

  • 저 가방
  • 제 가방
Check the answer

Answer: 제 가방

저 가방: before a noun can mean that over there; it is not this possessive form.

제 가방: is the possessive form used here.

Question 9

Ask whether a bag is available, using the explicit subject form.

  • 가방이 있어요?
  • 가방을 있어요?
Check the answer

Answer: 가방이 있어요?

가방이 있어요?: This asks whether the bag exists or is available.

가방을 있어요?: An object particle does not fit this existence construction.

Question 10

Ask where a known book is.

  • 방에 책이 있어요?
  • 책이 어디에 있어요?
Check the answer

Answer: 책이 어디에 있어요?

방에 책이 있어요?: This instead asks whether a book is in a particular room.

책이 어디에 있어요?: 어디에 requests its location.

Question 11

You had no time yesterday. Choose the past absence form.

  • 어제 시간이 없었어요.
  • 어제 시간이 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 어제 시간이 없었어요.

어제 시간이 없었어요.: 없었어요 marks absence in the past.

어제 시간이 있어요.: This uses the affirmative present form instead of the requested past absence.

Question 12

Does the ordinary existence predicate require a different basic word for a cat and a book?

  • Yes, all living nouns require a different basic existence predicate.
  • No, both can use the same ordinary existence predicate.
Check the answer

Answer: No, both can use the same ordinary existence predicate.

Yes, all living nouns require a different basic existence predicate.: That rule confuses other languages’ systems and Korean honorific distinctions.

No, both can use the same ordinary existence predicate.: The basic pattern is not divided solely by whether the thing is alive.

Question 13

Does 책이 있어요, without more context, prove there is exactly one book?

  • No, context or a quantity expression is needed.
  • Yes, the lack of a plural suffix always proves one.
Check the answer

Answer: No, context or a quantity expression is needed.

No, context or a quantity expression is needed.: The noun alone does not force an exact singular count.

Yes, the lack of a plural suffix always proves one.: Korean number reference does not work that mechanically.

Question 14

A question asks whether you have a bag. You do. Which concise response supplies the answer?

  • 아니요, 없어요.
  • 네, 있어요.
Check the answer

Answer: 네, 있어요.

아니요, 없어요.: This denies availability and conflicts with the stated situation.

네, 있어요.: The understood bag can be omitted and the predicate confirms availability.

Keep the conversation going

What to practice next

Produce the two messages before opening the questions. Later, return without the model and explain the distinction that changed your answer.

Sources and editorial notes

By Loquus ·

Source checked with AI assistance

Original explanations checked against the cited sources with AI assistance. Not independently certified by a human language specialist. Contemporary standard South Korean is the teaching baseline.

Learning research behind the practice

Worked examples, retrieval practice, and later review inform the activities. These studies do not establish the effectiveness of this specific lesson.

Questions and discussion

Share a question, an example, or your feedback. Use a display name rather than personal details. Names are unverified. Comments and replies appear after moderation.

Your name, comment, and submission time are stored for moderation and publication. We do not ask for your email. To help limit spam, we temporarily store a coded abuse identifier. Approved comments stay public until removed. To request removal, contact Loquus support.

Loquus in your language

Choose your website language

This page is currently available with English explanations.