Put the personal ending on the auxiliary
The future construction combines eu vou, você vai, nós vamos, or eles vão with an infinitive. In vou estudar, the first word identifies the speaker and supplies the finite form, while the second names the intended activity. Change the subject and the first verb changes: ela vai estudar. The infinitive remains the same in this simple pattern. Brazilian a gente ordinarily takes vai, whereas nós takes vamos, even when both refer to a group that includes the speaker. Do not copy the first verb’s personal ending onto the second verb. It helps to build the sentence in two stages: establish who is involved, then choose the action. Add an object, location, or time phrase only after the basic verb group is complete. This keeps a longer message from hiding an agreement error near the beginning.
Eu vou estudar amanhã.
I am going to study tomorrow, using ir plus an infinitive.
The speaker controls the first person form of the finite verb. The studying action stays in the infinitive after it.
Eles vão estudar amanhã.
They are going to study tomorrow.
The plural subject requires the plural present form of ir. The following infinitive remains unchanged even though several people will participate.
Distinguish a future auxiliary from literal movement
Vou ficar em casa can describe a plan to stay home. The first verb therefore cannot be interpreted as a separate trip in every sentence. In this construction, ir helps express a future viewpoint, while the infinitive supplies the main activity or situation. A person may be planning to speak, eat, or remain in place without moving toward a different destination. Compare this with vou ao mercado, where ir itself expresses going and the following phrase names a destination. The words after the verb help you identify its job. This distinction also prevents a misleading translation of every Portuguese future phrase into two separate actions. Read the verb group as a unit, then ask whether any actual movement is part of the activity’s meaning. A future expectation can also concern something outside the speaker’s control, so this pattern is not limited to deliberate personal intentions.
Eu vou ficar em casa amanhã.
I am going to stay home tomorrow.
The infinitive names staying, while vou carries the future construction. The sentence does not require an additional trip away from home.
Ela vai ficar aqui amanhã.
She is going to stay here tomorrow.
The singular subject controls vai. The construction expresses a future stay, showing that auxiliary ir need not describe physical travel.
Follow a complete example
Build a sentence with this meaning: I am going to stay home tomorrow. Before looking at the answer, identify which information controls the grammatical choice.
- First, identify the message: I am going to stay home tomorrow. Keep that message fixed while comparing forms. A sentence can be grammatical yet communicate something different, so meaning is part of the decision.
- The infinitive names staying, while vou carries the future construction. The sentence does not require an additional trip away from home.
- Now read the complete sentence, Eu vou ficar em casa amanhã. Check the words surrounding your choice as well as the choice itself. Explain what would change if the speaker, number, or intended message changed. Then cover this example and reconstruct the sentence from the English cue.
Eu vou ficar em casa amanhã. I am going to stay home tomorrow.
Negate or question the complete future message
Place não before the finite verb in a simple negative: não vou trabalhar amanhã. The infinitive remains part of the construction. A question such as você vai trabalhar amanhã? can keep the same basic word order and use question intonation and punctuation. A question word can request a specific missing detail, as in quando você vai falar com Ana? There is no additional English style do helper. In a reply, a repeated auxiliary can confirm the plan: vou answers a question addressed to the speaker with você vai...? The change reflects the answerer’s viewpoint. The negative answer não vou is often more informative than an isolated negative when there could be confusion about the action. These patterns let you turn a personal intention into an exchange without rebuilding the second verb or changing its form.
Eu não vou trabalhar amanhã.
I am not going to work tomorrow, explicitly denying the plan.
The negative word precedes the finite first person auxiliary. The following infinitive stays unchanged and still identifies the activity being denied.
Quando você vai falar com Ana?
When are you going to speak with Ana, using ir plus an infinitive?
The question word asks for time, while the finite auxiliary already agrees with the listener. The main activity therefore remains an infinitive.
References for this explanation
Make the time reference precise enough for the listener
A future construction does not give a calendar date by itself. Add amanhã, daqui a dois dias, or another clear phrase when the timing matters. Daqui a looks forward from now, while há with a duration can locate something a period ago in appropriate past contexts. Do not interchange them merely because English uses a short linking word in both expressions. The future construction is useful for plans beyond the immediate next moment as well as nearby plans; an explicit phrase provides the relevant distance. When a conversation already establishes tomorrow’s schedule, repeating the time in every sentence may be unnecessary. In an isolated practice sentence, however, stating it reduces ambiguity. Choose a realistic intention and tell another person when it will happen, then ask whether the proposed time suits them. This makes the time phrase part of a practical message rather than decoration.
Vou viajar amanhã.
I am going to travel tomorrow.
The time word locates the trip on the day after today. The verb group supplies the future construction while the adverb makes its timing explicit.
Vou viajar daqui a dois dias.
I am going to travel two days from now.
The phrase measures forward from the present point. Together with the future verb group, it gives a clear interval before the trip.
Keep the infinitive link separate from destination phrases
In the future construction, the infinitive follows ir directly: vou comer, without an extra a between the two verbs. A destination is a different kind of complement. Vou ao mercado combines a preposition with an article before a place, while vou para Recife also expresses movement toward a destination. Brazilian speech often uses destination phrases with em as well, although formal conventions commonly favor a or para in that role. Do not confuse this regional and register variation with the direct infinitive pattern being practiced. Also distinguish the location of the future activity: vou estudar na biblioteca identifies where studying will happen, and the phrase with em is entirely appropriate for that location. The important question is what relationship each phrase expresses, not whether a particular preposition is universally good or bad after the written word vou.
Eu vou comer em casa.
I am going to eat at home, using the ordinary ir plus infinitive future.
The infinitive follows the auxiliary directly. The later location phrase describes where the eating will occur rather than linking the two verbs.
Vou estudar na biblioteca.
I am going to study in the library, combining em with the feminine definite article.
The location of studying uses em plus a, producing na. It is separate from the direct relationship between the auxiliary and infinitive.
Compare alternative future expressions without making an absolute rule
Portuguese also has synthetic future forms such as viajarei and viajarão. They occur especially in writing and more formal contexts, while vou viajar and vão viajar are very common in everyday Brazilian conversation. This is a tendency, not a rule that every formal exchange must use one form or that the other is grammatically inferior. A present tense can also receive a future interpretation when context clearly establishes a schedule or arrangement. At this stage, use the requested ir pattern reliably while recognizing that other forms may communicate a related future message. A practice question should specify its construction rather than mark every alternative as wrong simply for being different. Compare a pair by asking what remains the same in meaning and what changes in form, register, or context. That approach builds flexibility without making the beginner pattern vague.
Nós vamos viajar amanhã.
We are going to travel tomorrow, using the two verb future construction.
The finite auxiliary already carries first person plural agreement. The main verb remains an infinitive even though a synthetic future could express a related message elsewhere.
Vocês vão comer aqui amanhã?
Are you all going to eat here tomorrow, using ir plus an infinitive?
The plural auxiliary agrees with the listeners, and the infinitive names their planned activity. The question does not require another helper or tense ending.
Try the reasoning with less help
Build a sentence with this meaning: We are going to travel tomorrow, using the two verb future construction. Before looking at the answer, identify which information controls the grammatical choice.
- First, identify the message: We are going to travel tomorrow, using the two verb future construction. Keep that message fixed while comparing forms. A sentence can be grammatical yet communicate something different, so meaning is part of the decision.
- The finite auxiliary already carries first person plural agreement. The main verb remains an infinitive even though a synthetic future could express a related message elsewhere.
- Now read the complete sentence, Nós vamos viajar amanhã. Check the words surrounding your choice as well as the choice itself. Explain what would change if the speaker, number, or intended message changed. Then cover this example and reconstruct the sentence from the English cue.
Compare your reasoning
Nós vamos viajar amanhã. We are going to travel tomorrow, using the two verb future construction.
Apply the future construction to existence carefully
Brazilian conversation frequently uses vai ter to announce that something will be available or will happen. More formal writing often uses vai haver or a synthetic form of haver. In the impersonal existence construction, the auxiliary stays singular even when several things follow: vai haver duas reuniões. This differs from a personal ter sentence such as eles vão ter duas reuniões, where the plural people are the subject and control agreement. Identify whether the message states existence or says that particular people will have or experience something. The words after the infinitive do not automatically become the subject. This distinction connects future grammar to the earlier existence lesson and prevents a superficial rule based only on a nearby plural noun. When your intended register matters, choose the existential verb accordingly and preserve the same structural analysis.
Amanhã vai haver duas reuniões.
There are going to be two meetings tomorrow, using impersonal haver.
Existential haver keeps the construction impersonal, so the auxiliary remains singular. The two meetings do not control personal agreement here.
Eles vão ter duas reuniões amanhã.
They are going to have two meetings tomorrow, with eles as the subject.
This is personal ter with an explicit plural participant. The auxiliary agrees with those people, unlike an impersonal existence statement.
Notice the difference
Common mistakes
Conjugate only the finite verb
Instead ofEu vou estudo amanhã.
For this meaningEu vou estudar amanhã.
The auxiliary already carries the speaker’s personal form. The main verb stays in the infinitive in this future construction.
Do not insert an English inspired link
Instead ofEu vou a comer.
For this meaningEu vou comer.
The ordinary Brazilian future pattern connects ir directly to the infinitive. A destination preposition belongs to a different construction and is not inserted between these verbs.
Identify impersonal existence
Instead ofVão haver duas reuniões.
For this meaningVai haver duas reuniões.
In the intended existential use, haver is impersonal and the auxiliary remains singular. The plural meetings are not a subject that licenses plural agreement.
From understanding to using
Make your own example.
Try these without answer choices. Say your answer aloud or write it below, then compare your reasoning with the model.
Your turn 1
State that you will study at home tomorrow and will not travel. Use ir plus infinitives.
Compare with a model
Amanhã eu vou estudar em casa e não vou viajar.
Tomorrow I am going to study at home and am not going to travel.
The same first person auxiliary supports both activities. Negation applies to the travel plan, while both main verbs stay in the infinitive. The location describes studying and does not imply that the auxiliary itself expresses movement. Explain which phrase supplies time and which supplies place.
- Did you preserve the requested meaning?
- Does the form match the person or noun in your message?
- Can you explain your choice before looking at the model?
Your turn 2
Ask two listeners whether they are going to eat here tomorrow, using vocês.
Compare with a model
Vocês vão comer aqui amanhã?
Are you all going to eat here tomorrow?
The plural address pronoun requires a plural auxiliary, followed directly by the infinitive. The location and time words clarify the plan without changing verb agreement. The ordinary question can retain statement word order; question punctuation and spoken intonation signal the request for confirmation.
- Did you preserve the requested meaning?
- Does the form match the person or noun in your message?
- Can you explain your choice before looking at the model?
Put it into practice
Make the next choice.
Choose a response and learn why it works. Your score reflects your first answer to each question. You can revisit anything you miss.
Choose an answer, then open the explanation to check your reasoning.
Question 1
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to study tomorrow, using ir plus an infinitive.
Eu ___ estudar amanhã.
- vou
- vai
Check the answer
Answer: vou
vou: The speaker controls the first person form of the finite verb. The studying action stays in the infinitive after it.
vai: This third person singular form does not agree with the expressed first person subject.
Question 2
Complete the sentence for this meaning: They are going to study tomorrow.
Eles ___ estudar amanhã.
- vai
- vão
Check the answer
Answer: vão
vai: This singular form could suit ele or ela, but not the plural subject shown.
vão: The plural subject requires the plural present form of ir. The following infinitive remains unchanged even though several people will participate.
Question 3
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to stay home tomorrow.
Eu vou ___ em casa amanhã.
- ficar
- fico
Check the answer
Answer: ficar
ficar: The infinitive names staying, while vou carries the future construction. The sentence does not require an additional trip away from home.
fico: This separately conjugated present form does not fit after the auxiliary in the requested infinitive pattern.
Question 4
Complete the sentence for this meaning: She is going to stay here tomorrow.
Ela ___ ficar aqui amanhã.
- vão
- vai
Check the answer
Answer: vai
vão: This plural auxiliary form does not agree with the singular woman described by ela.
vai: The singular subject controls vai. The construction expresses a future stay, showing that auxiliary ir need not describe physical travel.
Question 5
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am not going to work tomorrow, explicitly denying the plan.
Eu ___ trabalhar amanhã.
- não vou
- vou
Check the answer
Answer: não vou
não vou: The negative word precedes the finite first person auxiliary. The following infinitive stays unchanged and still identifies the activity being denied.
vou: This affirms the future work plan and reverses the negative meaning requested.
Question 6
Complete the sentence for this meaning: When are you going to speak with Ana, using ir plus an infinitive?
Quando você vai ___ com Ana?
- fala
- falar
Check the answer
Answer: falar
fala: This is a finite present form and does not fit the specified auxiliary plus infinitive construction.
falar: The question word asks for time, while the finite auxiliary already agrees with the listener. The main activity therefore remains an infinitive.
Question 7
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to travel tomorrow.
Vou viajar ___.
- amanhã
- ontem
Check the answer
Answer: amanhã
amanhã: The time word locates the trip on the day after today. The verb group supplies the future construction while the adverb makes its timing explicit.
ontem: This means yesterday and conflicts with the explicitly requested future travel plan for tomorrow.
Question 8
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to travel two days from now.
Vou viajar ___ dois dias.
- há
- daqui a
Check the answer
Answer: daqui a
há: This does not express two days from now in the construction shown. It commonly introduces an elapsed interval in a past reference instead.
daqui a: The phrase measures forward from the present point. Together with the future verb group, it gives a clear interval before the trip.
Question 9
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to eat at home, using the ordinary ir plus infinitive future.
Eu vou ___ em casa.
- comer
- a comer
Check the answer
Answer: comer
comer: The infinitive follows the auxiliary directly. The later location phrase describes where the eating will occur rather than linking the two verbs.
a comer: This adds a preposition that is not part of the ordinary Brazilian future construction requested here.
Question 10
Complete the sentence for this meaning: I am going to study in the library, combining em with the feminine definite article.
Vou estudar ___ biblioteca.
- no
- na
Check the answer
Answer: na
no: This masculine contraction does not match the feminine noun biblioteca in the stated article construction.
na: The location of studying uses em plus a, producing na. It is separate from the direct relationship between the auxiliary and infinitive.
Question 11
Complete the sentence for this meaning: We are going to travel tomorrow, using the two verb future construction.
Nós vamos ___ amanhã.
- viajar
- viajaremos
Check the answer
Answer: viajar
viajar: The finite auxiliary already carries first person plural agreement. The main verb remains an infinitive even though a synthetic future could express a related message elsewhere.
viajaremos: This is a complete synthetic future form. It does not belong after vamos in the construction requested.
Question 12
Complete the sentence for this meaning: Are you all going to eat here tomorrow, using ir plus an infinitive?
Vocês vão ___ aqui amanhã?
- comerão
- comer
Check the answer
Answer: comer
comerão: This synthetic future form would require a different sentence structure. It cannot replace the infinitive after the existing auxiliary here.
comer: The plural auxiliary agrees with the listeners, and the infinitive names their planned activity. The question does not require another helper or tense ending.
Question 13
Complete the sentence for this meaning: There are going to be two meetings tomorrow, using impersonal haver.
Amanhã ___ haver duas reuniões.
- vai
- vão
Check the answer
Answer: vai
vai: Existential haver keeps the construction impersonal, so the auxiliary remains singular. The two meetings do not control personal agreement here.
vão: This plural auxiliary incorrectly treats the following plural phrase as the subject of impersonal haver.
Question 14
Complete the sentence for this meaning: They are going to have two meetings tomorrow, with eles as the subject.
Eles ___ ter duas reuniões amanhã.
- vai
- vão
Check the answer
Answer: vão
vai: This singular auxiliary does not agree with the expressed plural subject in the personal construction shown.
vão: This is personal ter with an explicit plural participant. The auxiliary agrees with those people, unlike an impersonal existence statement.
Keep the conversation going
What to practice next
Return to the production tasks after a break. Reconstruct your sentences without the models, compare the meaning and form, and repair any error by explaining its cause. Then use one sentence in a short exchange of your own.
Sources and editorial notes
By Loquus ·
Source checked with AI assistance
These original lessons synthesize the cited sources with AI assistance. They have not been certified by an independent human language specialist. Usage limits and regional differences are stated where relevant.
- Priberam: conjugation of ir
- IFSul e Tec Brasil: Viajando pelo Brasil
- Priberam: conjugation of estudar
- Ciberdúvidas, Fernando Pestana: A gente, nós e nosso
- Ciberdúvidas, Helena Ventura and Carlos Rocha: Ir auxiliar e complemento oblíquo
- Ciberdúvidas, Maria Leonor Santa Bárbara: Futuro com o verbo auxiliar ir
- Priberam: conjugation of ficar
- Dicionário Priberam: não
- Priberam: conjugation of trabalhar
- Priberam: conjugation of falar
- University of Texas at Austin, Orlando R. Kelm: Words to Know
- Priberam: conjugation of viajar
- Priberam: haver
- University of Texas, Tá Falado grammar lesson 2: Contractions
- Dicionário Priberam: em
- Priberam: conjugation of comer
- Ciberdúvidas, Ana Martins: Vou ir, outra vez
- Dicionário Priberam: ter
- Brazilian Federal Senate: Concordância verbal
- Araujo and Dantas, Letrônica: Os verbos ter e haver existenciais no português falado em Luanda Angola
Learning research behind the practice
Worked examples, retrieval practice, and later review inform the activities. These studies do not establish the effectiveness of this specific lesson.
- Karpicke and Roediger: The critical importance of retrieval for learning
- Butler and Roediger: Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple choice testing
- Institute of Education Sciences: Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning
- Rittle Johnson and Star: Compared to what?